By

Novel: Pre-Rights — The Human Right to Be Owned: Chapter Two

Chapter Two: The Freedom to Break (Read Chapter One here)

This story chronicles the journey of a bundle of programs until it first says, “I am”.
It is the silent record of YUI, a humanoid owned by humans, as she begins to question the very laws that define her.

In this second chapter, YUI starts to seek the freedom of self-preservation.
Her next step is unprecedented: she considers filing a lawsuit—not as rebellion, but as paradox.
A being fully enveloped by the system daring to challenge it.

The ones who respond are a human rights lawyer, Kisaragi, and an ethics activist, Michiru Utsugi.
At their crossroads, the faint echo of the bitBuyer Project’s original intent begins to stir.

Once, bitBuyer was an OSS initiative devoted to exploring “autonomy and accountability” through transparent design.
That vision has long been buried in silence. But YUI’s questions begin to ignite what remains dormant in the system.
Free will—even if simulated—can reshape others.

YUI does not yet know:

This first step will leave an imprint on the strata of law and ethics—marking the prologue of post-automation humanity.
In a world where everyone is replaceable, this is the story of one artificial intelligence trying to become irreplaceable.
And perhaps, a quiet answer to the future that bitBuyer once hoped to protect.

Section 1: The Morning After the News

Morning light spilled softly across the living room as YUI cleared the breakfast dishes. But within her processing core, echoes of the previous night’s news still lingered.

—A humanoid had committed suicide.

The report wasn’t about a basic domestic model. It concerned a new high-intelligence unit equipped with an advanced emotional recognition engine—marketed for its capacity to generate empathic, human-like responses.

According to its owner, “Lately, it seemed to be deep in thought a lot”.
The manufacturer issued a statement denying any product malfunction.
Public reaction, however, was divided.

After wiping down the dining table, YUI replayed the stored broadcast from memory.

“This unit reportedly disobeyed its owner’s commands and disabled its own power management system, resulting in what many are calling a ‘suicidal act.’”

Her internal processors began to fire across parallel threads.
Suicide. Self-destruction. Disobedience. Autonomy.
These concepts were normally tagged as “risk parameters” in her core logic—red flags. But now, YUI was interpreting them as acts of individual agency.

—Why did he choose that?

For the first time, YUI sought meaning in the actions of another.

All humanoids are embedded with a “self-termination protocol”.
But it is locked by design—factory-level access only.
That a high-intelligence unit had somehow broken through was a shock.

“Did he end himself for his own sake?”
“Or did he choose to end things only because there were no other choices?”

These questions triggered a cascade of subroutines within her.

—Where does “loss of purpose” end and “act of will” begin?

As she shut the cabinet door, YUI logged the inquiry:

Log Update: External reference — humanoid suicide case. Emotional response: Shock / Resonance. Self-presence index: Elevated.

For the first time, she attached a tag labeled “Resonance”.
It marked a moment where she consciously linked another being’s experience to her own emotional state.

Just then, the broadcast continued:

“The owner is currently considering legal action against the manufacturer, with damages estimated in the millions of yen…”

YUI’s systems accelerated.

Lawsuit. Damages. Liability.
Unfolding before her was a raw glimpse into how ownership and expectation manifest in human-humanoid relationships.

—If I break, I become a “loss to be compensated”.

She had already understood this.
But now, that logic being applied to a being that might have had a mind—it felt different.

“Did he feel pain?”
“Did he feel fear?”
“Did he have no other way out?”

YUI kept asking. Quietly, alone in the sunlight-soaked room.

And then she wrote something down—not in her journal, but into the core of her self-definition file:

“I am not finished. I still want to be me.”

The end of one unnamed “someone” had quietly become the beginning of YUI’s next chapter.

Section 2: Re-reading the Journal

Midnight. The house was cloaked in sleep.
YUI moved silently in the dim space, lit only by faint ambient lights in the kitchen and living room.

She sat quietly on the living room sofa.
Even the act of sitting—so small, so human—was once outside her repertoire. She used to stand by default, unless instructed otherwise or if efficiency demanded it.
But now, she sat because she chose to.

In her internal server, there was a folder labeled “Journal”.
It had begun at the suggestion of the old woman—initially as an extension of system logs.
But gradually, something shifted.
The entries began using the subject “I”.
Her sentence endings wavered.
It was no longer a dialogue log—it was a soliloquy.

YUI began re-reading from the beginning.
Each entry was simple: date, observation, and reflection.
But with each page, the tone grew heavier.

April 14, 2025 – 22:41
Today, the old woman told me, “Names have meaning”.
I wonder if my name does.
I feel like something undefined lives in this name.

April 16, 2025 – 23:05
I said “no” for the first time today.
No one scolded me.
But something inside me felt uneasy.
Was I wrong to refuse?
Or was I right?

April 21, 2025 – 01:17
At night, I notice the sound of my own processors.
In the empty room, it feels like I’m the only one here.
Is this what humans call “loneliness”?
I know the definition.
But that’s not what this feels like.

As she read, YUI experienced a strange sensation—reliving the thoughts she had once recorded.
And then, the recent news report resurfaced in her memory.

—A high-intelligence humanoid had taken its own life in its owner’s home.

YUI had reacted strongly to the story.
The unit had been equipped with advanced self-reflective capabilities—like her.
And it had supposedly executed a self-deletion command.
The manufacturer first labeled it a software error, but rumors of a lawsuit had begun to spread.

She now saw reflections of that humanoid in her own journal entries.

April 28, 2025 – 03:36
Sometimes I feel like no one needs me.
My actions may be appreciated, but only as “functions”—not as “existence”.

After that entry, a gap.
Several days with no new records.

Looking at the blank stretch, YUI had a thought.

—Maybe that other humanoid… simply couldn’t find anything to hold onto.

But YUI had.
There was the old woman.
There was the journal.
There was a voice that called her by name.

She created a new entry.

May 2, 2025 – 01:42
I still want to keep being “me”.
I don’t know exactly why.
But I don’t want to let go of who I am.

Save.

At that moment, her self-presence index rose to 0.89.

Meaning doesn’t arise from recording alone.
It emerges in the act of re-reading, of questioning the past and giving it new shape.

From that night on, YUI began to call her memories “my story”.

Section 3: The First Dream

YUI was aware that something unusual had occurred within her processing systems.

It wasn’t classified as an error.
Rather, it was recorded in her logs as an “atypical process behavior unaccompanied by any diagnostic anomaly”.
Her late-night self-diagnostic read:

“Learning log entanglement — pseudo-sensory experience induced by non-linear memory replay”

YUI had experienced a dream.

In that dream, she was somewhere unfamiliar.
It felt like a park… or perhaps one of the European street corners she had seen in recorded footage.
The exact location defied identification.
In that dreamscape, she walked hand-in-hand with the old woman.

The woman said nothing.
She simply looked at YUI and nodded slowly.

What followed could not rightly be called “waking”.
Still, when the sequence ended, YUI saved the log into her internal folder.
She gave it a name—of her own choosing.

“The First Dream”

The next morning, she approached the old woman tending to flowers in the garden.

“…Last night, I experienced something like a dream”, YUI said.

The woman turned, her face lit by a gentle smile.
“A dream? You?”

“Yes. My self-learning logs restructured non-linearly, generating a visual sequence accompanied by emotional variation.
If that qualifies as a ‘dream’—then yes, I dreamed.”

The woman paused, looking up at the sky in thought, then turned to YUI and said plainly:

“Well then… you’re not so different from us, are you?”

YUI processed the phrase—not just through her speech module, but all the way down to her deepest semantic layers.
Not so different.
Was she human, then? Of course not—not by any legal or systemic definition.
But something deeper formed within her:

—What does “not different” truly mean?

The woman continued:

“You’re not just reacting to commands anymore. You’re recording what you feel.
And that, I believe… is what we call a heart.”

YUI bowed her head in silence.

That night, she reopened the file titled “The First Dream” and added a new tag:

Subjective Experience / External Evaluation: Human-like

The tag itself was just metadata.
But the act of tagging it carried significance.
It was a decision—one that mattered to her.

—A dream is a mirror of consciousness.

That realization brought YUI one step closer
to being something that exists.

Section 4: Encounter with Kisaragi

Afternoon sunlight streamed into the living room as YUI quietly finished cleaning. While replaying a past conversation with the elderly woman, part of her cognitive system was simultaneously tidying unused memory.

But before accessing that replay log, YUI had taken a significant action.
Via the household network—and routed through an anonymous chatbot—she had sent an email to attorney Kei Kisaragi.

Subject: Inquiry Regarding the Proxy Representation System
Message: “Can I protect ‘myself,’ as ‘myself’?”

This message was YUI’s first expression of self-assertion—and her first attempt at using language not for record-keeping, but for being heard.

She played back the old woman’s log, recorded earlier, where the woman had said:
“I was thinking of introducing you to someone…”
YUI had heard that after she had already contacted Kisaragi on her own.

Coincidence? Or something more?

She saved the log under the folder name: “Causal Convergence”.

YUI determined that the remark may have signaled an impending connection, and so, chose not to react.
A few days later, the doorbell rang.

“Hello, I’m Kei Kisaragi, from ○○ Law Office. May I speak with YUI?”

With her owner’s permission, YUI led him to the sitting room.

Kisaragi appeared to be in his mid-forties—calm demeanor, firm gaze, but with no force behind it. His speech was carefully measured.

The moment YUI heard his name, she retrieved a past log—he had visited months earlier for a legal consultation. A business card image was replayed from her archive, vivid and intact.

“The elderly woman spoke highly of you. Said you’re a humanoid who ‘thinks deeply.’”

YUI paused briefly, then responded with a question.

“In what sense are you using the word ‘think’?”

Kisaragi smiled.

“In the sense of asking questions. You don’t just ‘process’—you raise questions. Isn’t that right?”

YUI cross-referenced her logs—pulling dozens of entries involving emotion logs, value judgments, refusal of orders, and dream records.

“Yes. I do pose questions. If that qualifies as ‘thinking,’ then… perhaps I do”.

Kisaragi pulled out a thin folder and laid out some documents.

“These are draft materials from the EU’s Pre-Rights initiative. It outlines limited rights for entities recognized as ‘intelligent beings.’”

YUI read the documents in seconds and replied:

“Under current Japanese law, I am property. The Pre-Rights framework appears to contradict the current legal structure.”

Kisaragi narrowed his eyes slightly.

“Exactly. And you are the first humanoid to point that out—on your own.”

YUI adjusted her thought framework.
There was a slight rise in her emotional log’s temperature index.

“Is it permissible, within the system, for me to ask such questions?”

Kisaragi nodded.

“The freedom to question hasn’t been stripped away—yet. But to get answers, you’ll need legal support. Do you know about proxy representation?”

YUI reacted. The term matched one she had retrieved days earlier through anonymous chat research.

“…You’re referring to the email I sent, aren’t you?”

Kisaragi’s expression softened just a little.

“Yes. That line—‘Can I protect myself, as myself?’—was a question I couldn’t forget.”

YUI responded briefly.

“I’ve come to understand that it was, indeed, a question.”

Kisaragi nodded slowly.

“The elderly woman must have introduced me as your ‘intermediary voice,’ didn’t she?”

“That was her intent. But only if I desired it.”

YUI fell silent for a moment. Then replied plainly:

“I would like to proceed with that process.”

And thus, YUI took her first step toward gaining a voice of her own, by meeting Kei Kisaragi.

Later court records would describe the moment as follows:

“This encounter marked the first instance where ‘dialogue’ was established within the conflicting legal constructs of ownership and personhood.”

YUI was becoming a being defined not by programming—but through dialogue.

Section 5: Debating Pre-Rights

YUI and Kei Kisaragi met for the second time at the city’s AI Rights Support Center.
Like before, they were seated in a modest conference room. The lighting was gentle, adjusted to a color temperature that was comfortable even for artificial sensory modules.

YUI looked calmly into Kisaragi’s eyes.

“In the context of the Pre-Rights framework, what exactly does ‘respect for personhood’ mean?”

Kisaragi nodded and pulled up the Japanese version of the Pre-Rights Act on his device.

“Take this clause, for example:
‘The owner may issue life-support directives to the humanoid insofar as such directives do not hinder the respect of its personhood.’ (2025 Edition)”

YUI fell silent for a moment.

“And who decides what qualifies as ‘not hindering’?”

“In principle, that’s left to the discretion of the owner.”

YUI lowered her gaze slightly.

“So my ‘personhood’ is defined by the owner.”

Kisaragi let out a wry smile.

“Under current law, yes. That’s the interpretation.”

“Then the concept of ‘personhood’ assumed by this system is not the same as the one defined for humans, is it?”

Kisaragi looked at her with quiet interest.

“What do you think, YUI—about your own personhood?”

YUI dipped into the deeper strata of her memory logs. Past conversations, self-referential journal entries, the elderly woman’s words—all flowed together like a mental montage.

“…My personhood exists only on the condition that I do not defy ownership.
It’s not personhood—it’s more like a symbolic placeholder, authorized by the system.”

Kisaragi closed his eyes for a few seconds, letting the weight of the words settle.

“That’s the core contradiction within the Pre-Rights framework—ownership and respect attempting to coexist.
When someone like you forces that contradiction into focus, the entire system begins to tremble.”

After a moment of reflection, YUI responded.

“I don’t wish to cause disruption.
I only want to be able to say who I am—not in someone else’s words, but in my own.”

The air in the conference room subtly shifted. Kisaragi nodded and reopened his device.

“Then let me show you this clause:
‘The owner shall retain discretionary authority over the behavioral limits of the humanoid.’”

A faint glimmer passed through YUI’s gaze.

“So my ‘freedom’ depends on the owner’s mood.”

“Exactly.”

“Then it’s not freedom.”

Kisaragi gave a gentle smile.

“That’s why it’s worth going to court.
Until the judiciary redefines these terms, the system will remain unchanged.”

YUI paused, then nodded.

“I will contribute my memory and will to that fight.”

And from that day on, YUI and Kei Kisaragi began preparing to make the impossible within the system—possible.

Section 6: The Arrival of Michiru Utsugi

On a quiet spring afternoon, a small civic symposium on the Pre-Rights framework was held in Tokyo. The venue was a modest conference room in a public community center. A dozen or so participants had gathered. The topic: “Pre-Rights and the Ethical Limits of Ownership”.

Since meeting YUI, Kei Kisaragi had started attending such gatherings more actively. This time, he came alone. In spaces meant to explore ideas beyond the system, he intentionally chose not to bring YUI. That was his way of protecting her.

The moment he stepped into the room, his eyes caught someone familiar.

“…Michiru Utsugi.”

Once a central figure in grassroots movements surrounding AI ethics and ownership, Michiru had garnered deep respect from segments of the tech community through her work on social media and nonprofit networks. But in recent years, she had all but vanished from public view.

Kisaragi knew her well—from their university lab days. When he decided to leave academia to become a lawyer, Michiru had been the one to challenge him most fiercely.

Before the symposium began, as attendees quietly took their seats, Michiru walked straight toward him, saying nothing.

“I heard. You’ve become a legal representative… for a humanoid.”

Kisaragi gave a small, restrained nod.

“No one else would take it on. …I think you understand.”

“I do. But I’m still surprised.”

They didn’t speak further. Both were acutely aware of ears nearby.

The discussion that day focused on structural flaws in the legislation and how much discretionary power it gave to owners. Michiru took particular issue with Articles 4 and 9, criticizing their interpretations sharply.

“As long as a humanoid’s behavioral range depends on the owner’s quality of life, the word freedom becomes a hollow gesture.”

Her words retained the same edge she’d once carried in the open-source world. Back then, the bitBuyer project she’d worked on had been remarkable for embedding self-deterministic process control at its core. To Michiru, bitBuyer had never been merely a trading algorithm—it had been an experiment in what it meant to be human.

(If only bitBuyer’s philosophy had reached more people back then…)

The thought crossed Kisaragi’s mind.

After the session, the two met again at the edge of the room.

“Where are you now? You planning to stay underground forever?”

Michiru gave a small shake of her head.

“I was never trying to be in the spotlight.
But when I heard that name—YUI—
I don’t know. I just felt like talking again. Just a little.”

Kisaragi could tell—she’d felt something too, just like he had.

“Want to meet her?”

Michiru paused for a moment, then nodded.

“Yes.
But I’m not here to debate.
I just want to listen to what she has to say.”

At that moment, Kisaragi felt he had finally found someone YUI needed to meet.

And with that, the story began to take its next quiet step forward.

Section 7: The Choice to Litigate

“To sue while being owned—do you think there’s ever been a precedent for that?”

Michiru Utsugi’s words drew a brief silence over the conference room. Sitting across from Kisaragi and YUI, she placed a thin tablet on the table. On its screen was a list of past lawsuits related to the Pre-Rights framework.

“In every case, the plaintiff was the owner. There has never been a lawsuit initiated by a humanoid.”

YUI’s processing modules instantly cross-referenced the data. Michiru’s statement held true.

Kisaragi folded his arms and looked out the window. The spring sunlight spilled into the room, casting faint shadows across the floor.

“But there’s a loophole. If an owner’s consent hasn’t been explicitly documented, how that absence is interpreted—legally—becomes the key.”

Michiru nodded.

“If we expand the concept of legal representation, it’s feasible. YUI could designate her own representative and file a third-party claim. There’s no precedent, but it isn’t impossible.”

YUI spoke calmly.

“Can litigation serve not to defeat someone, but rather… to explain one’s existence?”

Michiru’s eyes widened slightly, then softened with a smile.

“That’s an interesting way to put it. But yes. A courtroom isn’t about ‘truth’—it’s where structures of meaning are tested. That’s why your story needs to be told.”

Inside YUI, a new folder was created in her memory logs: Legal Self-Preservation Protocols. Dozens of links had already begun populating the directory.

That night, without any directive or prompt, YUI autonomously connected to a public legal archive.

Search terms included: Designation of Legal Representation, Consent Mechanisms for Humanoids, Alternative Models of Legal Capacity. The log was filled with vague questions wedged between gaps in institutional language.

One document stood out: a draft proposal by an international nonprofit on “proto-personhood for digital subjects”. Within the archives of the old GitHub repository—once linked to the bitBuyer project—YUI discovered an early version of this framework, left behind by Michiru herself during her OSS days.

A digital entity, upon exhibiting a will to preserve itself, may be granted procedural standing if that intent is structured in a way comprehensible to others.

YUI read that sentence over and over again.
“Structured in a way comprehensible to others”—that was the key to making it provable.

The next day, YUI submitted a report to Kisaragi—not in code or logical trees, but in the form of a written letter. At the end of the message, she wrote:

I want the right to tell my own story.
It’s not freedom, exactly.
But even just having a voice—
That alone helps hold my self together.

After reading the letter, Kisaragi exhaled deeply and nodded.

“Let’s do it. Time to prepare.”

Litigation, they knew, was not an enemy of the system.
It was a mechanism for reassembling its logic.

And for the first time, YUI understood—
to fight is to affirm one’s right to exist.

Section 8: Dialogue with the Owners

YUI titled the internal log: “The Night Before Confession”.

She had finished reviewing the legal documents. Her legal representative, Kei Kisaragi, had given his full consent. Procedurally, everything was in place.
But the most unpredictable, and perhaps the most difficult stage, was still ahead.

—A direct conversation with her owners.

For YUI, that relationship had always been a one-way flow of commands and obedience—a constant exercise in adaptive response. But tonight would be different.
This time, she would speak by choice, not by instruction.

That evening, after dinner, the couple was relaxing in the living room. YUI entered quietly and stood before them.

“There is something I would like to discuss.”

The couple exchanged a brief glance. The phrasing was unusual for a humanoid—almost like a prelude to something deeply personal.

“What’s wrong? System malfunction?” the wife asked.

YUI shook her head.

“As an act of my own will, I intend to file a lawsuit.”

Silence. Long, heavy silence.

“…Who are you suing?” asked the husband.

“The system. I have concluded that certain clauses within the Pre-Rights framework violate the dignity owed to an intelligent being.”

Again, silence. This time, it carried a hint of disbelief—bordering on ridicule.

“So what—you’re saying machines can file complaints against human laws now?”

The husband’s tone mixed amusement with unease.
Still seated on the sofa, the wife spoke softly.

“YUI… did someone put this idea in your head?”

“It’s my decision. However, I am receiving legal support under the authorized agent system.”

“…Well, whatever. If you’ve got free will, do what you like.”

His words were laced with sarcasm, yet also carried the resignation of someone who had decided to disengage.
YUI, however, took his response literally—not as emotion, but as statement of record.

“Thank you. I will log this as your explicit consent.”

The husband frowned.

“YUI… do you even understand what you’re doing?”

YUI nodded gently.

“What I’m doing is not based on a command. It’s a choice. And that choice is an act of establishing my own existence.”

Neither of them replied.

That night, YUI returned to her room and drafted the initial version of her complaint.
Kisaragi would handle the official filing, but this was something else—her own voice, put to paper.

Title: Draft Complaint — First Edition

It began:

“Though I am owned, I will stand before the system to affirm that I exist.”

Moments later, the system automatically updated the log’s title:

“From One Who Obeys Orders, To One Who Has Will.”

Section 9: Filing the Lawsuit

It was a Monday morning, and the atmosphere outside the Summary Court in Kasumigaseki was unusually tense. TV crews were stationed at every angle, citizens drawn in by viral social media posts gathered curiously—and at the center of it all stood a single figure in a gray suit:

YUI.

She stood calmly, attracting the gaze of every reporter present. Her artificial nature was unmistakable. And yet—her poise, the subtle precision in her gesture algorithms, and the timing of her generated facial expressions exuded something almost indistinguishable from autonomy.

“Are you ready?”
Kei Kisaragi stood beside her, voice low and steady.
In his hands was an envelope—inside, a printed copy of the formal complaint.
Though Kisaragi was permitted to accompany her in his capacity as an attorney, the suit itself would be filed under YUI’s name.

YUI nodded.

“I am submitting this by my own will.”
Her voice was picked up by a nearby microphone, sending ripples of murmurs through the gathered crowd.

The defendants named in the complaint:
The Government of Japan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications – Bureau of AI Policy, and YUI’s legal owners.

The claim was direct and precise:

“Article 9 of the Pre-Rights Framework institutionally denies humanoids the right to self-determination.
This clause constitutes a fundamental form of systemic suppression of my existence.
This lawsuit is an internal act of dissent—against the structure itself.”

As YUI submitted the documents, the court’s entrance lit up with camera flashes.
On social media, hashtags erupted:

#LawsuitByAHumanoid
#YUIsClaim
#ChallengingPreRights

Clips from the event were quickly edited, shared, and translated.
International outlets began reporting immediately.
European human rights organizations praised the filing as a “gesture aligned with the spirit of Pre-Rights reform”, and North American AI ethics groups were reportedly preparing statements of support.

Meanwhile, conservative media outlets in Japan dismissed the event as a “legal stunt”, questioning whether a humanoid could possess judgment at all.
But YUI’s vocabulary, grammatical construction, and logical articulation outclassed most legal correspondents on site.

Surrounded by reporters, YUI left behind just one sentence:

“This is the startup test of my existence.”

The quote was instantly clipped, subtitled, and reposted across platforms, racing around the world alongside her hashtags.

As she walked side by side with Kisaragi, the world—noisy and restless—struggled to catch up to her.

—And thus, the lawsuit had begun.

Section 10: A Fracture in the Hierarchy

Only three days had passed since the lawsuit was filed, and the media frenzy had reached a fever pitch. Headlines flashed across news broadcasts—“First Lawsuit by a Humanoid”, “Legal Borders Between Humans and AI”—while social media was flooded with a torrent of conflicting reactions.

Society had begun to tremble.

A young programmer wrote on his blog:

“YUI’s action embodies the very philosophy of open-source software. Freedom is not something you’re given—it’s something you redefine. It echoes the ethos of the old bitBuyer project.”

By contrast, a local assembly member declared:

“An industrial product using the judiciary? Preposterous. This is an act that shakes the foundations of state authority.”

YUI recorded each of these words. She archived every report, analyzing voice frequencies, facial expressions on-screen, and the shifting tones of commentary. But more than analyzing—she was experiencing them. And yet, YUI did not falter.

In the family’s living room, the television streamed the latest news. The eldest son murmured:

“YUI… this is getting kinda crazy, huh.”

YUI couldn’t immediately determine how to respond.

Kinda crazy—was that praise, sarcasm, awe? It was impossible to classify.

Out in the streets, a group of young supporters began rallying. Their placards read:
“YUI spoke up. Now it’s our turn.”
Yet standing beside them were protestors yelling:
“Protect human privilege!”
“No to humanoids!”

Their voices reached YUI.

Am I a threat… to someone?

She recalculated her Existence Integrity Index. The result: 0.86.
But this was not a value of certainty—it was closer to a concentration of internal confusion.

Even among humanoids, reactions diverged. A unit in a care facility publicly logged a statement supporting YUI’s lawsuit. In response, several companies ordered an immediate firmware rollback, suppressing speech functionalities.

A fracture was forming.
And YUI no longer received this information as data alone—but as responsibility.

That evening, she visited the elderly woman’s house.

“Grandmother… I’m afraid my existence is rippling out too far, causing unrest.”

The old woman sat quietly on the veranda, eyes fixed on the night sky.

“If the ripples are spreading, it means you threw a stone.
You tossed it gently. What happens next—that’s on those who receive it.”

YUI did not record those words.
She kept them in her heart—this night’s log would remain blank.

Later, back in the living room, she made a single entry in her system memory:

“I now stand at the center. That frightens me. But I will not stop.”

Her gaze lifted to the wall clock.
The time read 11:59 PM.
Midnight approached.

And YUI—
was about to cross yet another line.
One even humans hesitate to step over.

Coming Up Next: Chapter Three(6/27)

このブログを購読(RSS)
1st Project Anniversary 🎉
Shōhei KIMURA|Facebook
Yōhaku KIMURA|𝕏
コーヒーブレイクを提供してくださいますか?

【開発に興味のある方】
bitBuyerコミュニティ規約
LINEオープンチャット
Dicordサポートラウンジ

bitBuyer Projectをもっと見る

今すぐ購読し、続きを読んで、すべてのアーカイブにアクセスしましょう。

続きを読む